A federal appeals court just said the President cannot directly remove the Voice of America chief, handing control to an unelected board.
Story Snapshot
- The D.C. Circuit said only the Broadcasting Board can remove the Voice of America director.
- Judges upheld an injunction restoring Michael Abramowitz after a disputed firing.
- The court said Congress’s firewall for editorial independence is constitutional.
- The administration argued Article II removal power should prevail, but lost.
What The Court Actually Held
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the Voice of America director cannot be removed without approval from the International Broadcasting Advisory Board. The court said the law gives appointment and removal power to that Board, not to the President or the head of the U.S. Agency for Global Media. The panel called those limits consistent with the Constitution and kept Michael Abramowitz in the job while the case proceeds.
The panel affirmed the district court’s injunction. The judges agreed that an order was needed because other remedies would not fix the harm of an unlawful ouster. The opinion described the Board as the lawful check on hasty removal. It also stated the Board could remove a network head by a majority vote. The court said that structure protects a legal “firewall” for journalistic independence at Voice of America and its sister networks.
Why This Matters For Separation Of Powers
The administration argued that Article II gives the President broad removal power over inferior officers. Government lawyers said the President can remove Board members at will and should not be blocked by a Board vote to remove the Voice of America chief. The court rejected that claim. The judges said Congress may vest appointment and removal of this inferior officer in the Board while the President retains indirect control through Board membership changes.
The court’s approach keeps a layer of independence around government broadcasting. The judges treated the removal rule as a guard for editorial integrity, different from normal civil service rules. That is why the court did not accept a simple chain of command from the White House to the newsroom. The court said the structure Congress wrote is lawful, even if it slows direct executive action against a network head in the short term.
What We Know And What We Do Not
Reports say the U.S. Agency for Global Media leader moved to fire Abramowitz without an independent Board vote. The court found that step violated the statute as the judges read it. Coverage also says the Board had lacked a quorum in recent years, which complicated any approval process. The record given here does not include the full statute text, the Board roster, or every filing. Those gaps limit the detail we can confirm beyond the court’s opinion.
The ruling is unanimous but could still face more review. A request for rehearing or a Supreme Court petition could follow. For now, the decision stands. It sets a clear rule for Voice of America leadership changes. The Board must act, not an agency chief acting alone. That message will shape any next steps the administration considers on leadership and on reform of the U.S. Agency for Global Media.
What Conservatives Should Watch Next
Congress can revisit the statute to restore clearer executive lines if it chooses. Lawmakers who want accountability over federal media can tighten oversight, set deadlines for Board votes, and ensure quorums cannot stall action. The court also noted the President may remove Board members. That tool, used lawfully, can align the Board with the elected agenda while keeping the firewall against propaganda and favoritism inside the newsroom.
The House voted on Tuesday evening to kill the push to impeach Secretary of War Pete Hegseth — and it did so without ever voting on impeachment itself. By a vote of 211 to 204, the House agreed to refer Representative Thomas Massie's impeachment resolution (H. Res. 1655) to the… pic.twitter.com/OH4wWzo6Bb
— The Good News (@TheGoodNewsonX) November 11, 2026
Voice of America should inform the world, not push any party line. The court’s ruling says the law protects that mission by requiring Board approval for firing the director. The administration argued for stronger Article II authority and lost this round. The path forward runs through the statute and the Board seats. If the people want change at Voice of America, they will need Congress to fix the law and a functioning Board to carry it out.
Sources:
reason.com, thehill.com, storage.courtlistener.com, courthousenews.com, alternet.org
