SNAP SLASHED – New Work Rules, States Pay More

House Republicans have introduced sweeping legislation that would dramatically reduce funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) while imposing stricter eligibility requirements as part of a broader effort to cut federal spending by $1.5 trillion.

At a Glance

  • House GOP proposal aims to save approximately $300 billion over ten years by reforming SNAP, the nation’s largest food assistance program serving over 40 million Americans
  • The plan would shift 5% of SNAP costs to states beginning in 2028, with increases based on error rates in benefit payments
  • New work requirements would apply to able-bodied adults 18-64 and parents with children over age 7, with certain exceptions
  • Federal match rate for state administration of SNAP would decrease from 50% to 25%
  • The proposal is part of a multitrillion-dollar package addressing taxes, immigration, energy, defense, and the national debt exceeding $36 trillion

Fiscal Responsibility vs. Food Security

House Republicans have introduced significant changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as part of a comprehensive legislative package aligned with former President Trump’s policy priorities. The proposed reforms to SNAP, which currently serves more than 40 million Americans, represent a major component of the GOP’s strategy to reduce federal spending by at least $1.5 trillion and address the national debt that now exceeds $36 trillion.

The ambitious legislation takes aim at federal welfare spending through multiple channels. Among the most significant changes proposed for SNAP are new work requirements for able-bodied adults aged 18-64, explicit exclusion of illegal migrants from receiving benefits, and a substantial shift of program costs from the federal government to state budgets. These modifications are projected to save approximately $300 billion over the next decade. 

Expanded Work Requirements

The proposed legislation would expand existing work requirements for SNAP recipients in several key ways. Under the new rules, parents with children over the age of 7 would be subject to work requirements, a significant change from current policy. The bill does include exceptions for certain groups including pregnant women, veterans, and homeless individuals, though these exemptions are set to expire in 2030 unless renewed by Congress.

House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson has defended the reforms, stating they would “restore program integrity without removing people from nutrition programs.” This perspective emphasizes the GOP’s position that the changes represent responsible governance rather than a reduction in essential services. Republicans have consistently argued that work requirements encourage self-sufficiency while ensuring benefits reach those most in need.

Shifting Costs to States

A major component of the proposed SNAP reforms involves transferring financial responsibility from the federal government to state governments. Beginning in fiscal year 2028, states would be required to cover 5% of SNAP benefit costs, with this percentage potentially increasing based on error rates in benefit payments. Additionally, the federal match rate for state administration of SNAP would be reduced from 50% to 25%.

This cost-sharing approach represents a fundamental shift in how nutrition assistance is funded in America. Supporters argue this will encourage states to administer programs more efficiently and reduce waste. Critics, including Rep. Angie Craig, have voiced concerns that these changes would ultimately harm families and seniors by reducing access to food assistance at a time when many households continue to struggle with grocery costs.

Broader Legislative Context

The proposed SNAP reforms are embedded within a larger multitrillion-dollar bill that addresses numerous aspects of federal policy including taxes, immigration, energy, and defense spending. This comprehensive approach reflects the GOP’s strategy to implement broad fiscal reforms rather than piecemeal adjustments to individual programs. The legislation represents a clear policy statement ahead of the upcoming transition in administration. 

As the bill moves through the legislative process, debate continues about the appropriate balance between fiscal responsibility and maintaining essential support systems for vulnerable Americans. The outcome will significantly impact millions of families who rely on SNAP benefits to put food on their tables, as well as state budgets that may need to absorb new costs if the legislation passes in its current form.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR