The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” promises tougher immigration enforcement with a million deportations annually, but faces critical questions about its economic and human costs.
At a Glance
- The House is considering a $150 billion budget for immigration enforcement targeting 1 million deportations annually
- Mass deportations could separate families with 5.62 million U.S. citizen children living with undocumented parents
- Economic analysis suggests deportations would reduce GDP by 4.2-6.8% and create labor shortages in key industries
- The operation would require hiring up to 409,000 new law enforcement officers amid existing staffing challenges
- Experts question whether deporting 1 million people yearly is sufficient given estimates of 11-12 million undocumented immigrants
Proposed Enforcement Measures and Scope
Congress is considering substantial funding for what would be the largest immigration enforcement operation in American history. The proposed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” includes approximately $150 billion for border security and immigration enforcement, with resources specifically allocated to deport approximately one million illegal immigrants annually. The legislation would significantly expand detention capabilities at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), strengthen border infrastructure, and increase the number of immigration judges to process cases more efficiently.
Critics question whether the annual target of one million deportations is sufficient given the scale of illegal immigration during the Biden administration. From fiscal years 2021 to 2023, Border Patrol encountered over 5 million illegal immigrants, with many released into the country. An additional estimated 2 million “gotaways” successfully evaded capture completely, according to government data.
https://t.co/1xLVFcpk8S Grok on applying the Barbara Jordan commission reforms on immigration today
— Neinpins (@NeinpinsS) May 13, 2025
Economic Implications of Mass Deportation
The economic consequences of large-scale deportations would be far-reaching according to multiple analyses. Studies suggest that mass deportation would reduce U.S. GDP by 4.2 to 6.8 percent over time as industries heavily dependent on immigrant labor face significant workforce disruptions. Construction, agriculture, hospitality, and food service sectors would experience acute labor shortages that would impact pricing and availability of goods and services for all Americans.
“On average, illegal aliens receive $2.40 in government benefits for each $1.00 they pay in both direct and indirect taxes. The average illegal alien household has an annual fiscal deficit over $20,000,” said Robert Rector.
Proponents of strict enforcement argue that while deportations require significant upfront investment, the long-term savings in government services would offset these costs. Current estimates indicate illegal immigration costs taxpayers billions annually in education, healthcare, and social services. The Heritage Foundation calculates that each illegal immigrant household creates a substantial net fiscal burden on American taxpayers when compared to tax contributions.
Family Impact and Implementation Challenges
One of the most controversial aspects of the enforcement plan involves family separation concerns. Approximately 4 million mixed-status families would be affected by mass deportations, including an estimated 8.5 million U.S. citizens – 5.1 million of whom are children. These families would face difficult choices between family separation or relocating citizen members to foreign countries.
The logistical challenges of implementing mass deportations are substantial. The operation would require hiring between 220,000 to 409,000 new law enforcement officers at a time when police departments nationwide struggle with recruitment. The immigration court system currently faces a backlog of approximately 3 million cases, necessitating significant expansion of judicial resources to process deportation orders legally and efficiently.
Policy Alternatives and Enforcement Priorities
Some immigration policy experts suggest targeted enforcement focused on specific priorities rather than raw numerical goals. Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies notes, “Achieving 1 million removals a year would be great, but we’ll never be able to simply deport our way out of the mess Biden and Mayorkas left.” This perspective suggests combining enforcement with deterrence measures and legal immigration reforms for a comprehensive approach.
The debate continues regarding which groups should be prioritized for enforcement. The Trump administration previously focused on those with criminal records, recent border crossers, and those with outstanding deportation orders. The proposed legislation would also target recipients of humanitarian parole and potentially DACA recipients, while expanding expedited removal procedures that allow for faster deportations without full court hearings.
